You may wish to discuss this topic on the user forum to determine if it is
a problem, feature request, or if there is a smart way to accomplish your
goal?
See https://geoserver.org/comm/ for instructions on how to use the forum!

This email list is for those working on the GeoServer project, if you are a
Java developer ask if you have a patch in mind for PointStackerProcess?

Aside: The Jira has a limited number of seats - it did not used to be that
way when we started using it.

- -
Jody Garnett


On Sep 16, 2024 at 9:30:39 AM, Jérôme LELONG via Geoserver-devel <
geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> We have a bug in our solution whose origin comes from the calculation of
> the boundingbox in the PointStacker process.
> Our solution displays equipment using an SLD that uses PointStacker. When
> the user clicks on the icon representing a 'stack', we display information
> on all the elements of the stack. To do this, we retrieve the bounding box
> of the elements of the stack (envBBOX attribute), then we perform a WFS
> query on this bounding box. Unfortunately the bounding box does not always
> cover all the elements of the stack.
>
> A code analysis led us to PointStackerProcess Ligne 518
> <https://github.com/geotools/geotools/blob/49011446e3367d67ae4424381eda70302a8b28c7/modules/unsupported/process-feature/src/main/java/org/geotools/process/vector/PointStackerProcess.java#L518>
> When the first point is added, the envelope is created, but it is not
> taken into account in the envelope.
>
> The Jira seems closed to the public, so I am writing this message here,
> excuse me if this is not the right process to follow.
>
> BR,
> Jérôme
> _______________________________________________
> Geoserver-devel mailing list
> Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
>
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel

Reply via email to