Hi Andreas, Catching up with developer activities - many weeks later. I am writing a blog post for Q4 and wanted to mention the great work you are doing.
I note one topic did not get feedback: - The Java package namespace of the existing modules is > "org.geoserver.security.oauth2." Should we keep this? Pro: The name fits > and renaming would require effort. Con: If users install both the previous > and the migrated modules together — which certainly won’t work — the > conflict may not be immediately apparent. My suggestion is to keep the > package name. > I like the idea of keeping the package name, but it may make it complicated for those working in an IDE with both modules loaded (say during a refactor)?
_______________________________________________ Geoserver-devel mailing list Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
