GeoServer doesn't currently allow you to disable this behavior for vector
output. (As I understand it, it originated with older versions of Google
Earth where popups were only rendered for point markers.) Here are some
options available to you:
* patch the code (start in
http://svn.codehaus.org/geoserver/branches/2.0.x/src/wms/src/main/java/org/vfny/geoserver/wms/responses/map/kml/KMLMapTransformer.java
)
* add a PointSymbolizer with a transparent PNG graphic to your SLD. This
will replace the default point symbolizer, not add on to it.
* use raster overlay mode, docs at
http://docs.geoserver.org/stable/en/user/googleearth/features/kmlreflector.html
--
David Winslow
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org/
On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 7:02 PM, Jeremy Palmer <[email protected]> wrote:
> I'm outputting vector KML for a polygon layer which does need to display
> labels, but needs a custom pop-up description. I have set an SLD for the
> polygon layer that only has a PolygonSymbolizer and I've created the
> appropriate featureType description.ftl and tile.ftl files for the custom
> popup. When I output the KML to display in Google Earth using a direct WMS
> query everything looks great and works how I expect it to.
>
> However when I try to display this same KML in Google Maps an additional
> point show up. Looking at the KML file it seems that an extra point geometry
> (maybe a centroid?) is being encoded into the multi-geometry object for each
> placemark, along with the style icon of
> http://icons.opengeo.org/markers/icon-poly.1.png.
>
> If I edit the KML file and take out the addition point geometry and remove
> the IconStyle, everything looks correct in both GE and GM i.e no more point
> placemarks. Also my popups are working how I except them to.
>
> Does anyone know if it is possible to get Geoserver to suppress the
> creation of this point geometry for each polygon placement?
>
> This is the specific query I used for getting the KML from geoserver:
>
>
> http://myserver/geoserver/wms?height=1024&width=1024&layers=mylayer&request=GetMap&service=wms&styles=mystyle&format_options=SUPEROVERLAY%3Afalse%3BKMPLACEMARK%3Afalse%3BKMSCORE%3A100%3BKMATTR%3Atrue%3B&srs=EPSG%3A4326&format=application%2Fvnd.google-earth.kmz%2Bxml&transparent=false&mode=download&version=1.1.1&BBOX=150,-60,195,-25
>
> I'm using Geoserver 2.0.2.
>
> Kind Regards,
> Jeremy
>
> ______________________________________________________________________________________________________
>
> This message contains information, which is confidential and may be subject
> to legal privilege.
> If you are not the intended recipient, you must not peruse, use,
> disseminate, distribute or copy this message.
> If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately
> (Phone 0800 665 463 or [email protected]) and destroy the original
> message.
> LINZ accepts no responsibility for changes to this email, or for any
> attachments, after its transmission from LINZ.
>
> Thank you.
>
> ______________________________________________________________________________________________________
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances
> and start using them to simplify application deployment and
> accelerate your shift to cloud computing.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev
> _______________________________________________
> Geoserver-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-users
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Virtualization is moving to the mainstream and overtaking non-virtualized
environment for deploying applications. Does it make network security
easier or more difficult to achieve? Read this whitepaper to separate the
two and get a better understanding.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/hp-phase2-d2d
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-users
