On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 2:58 PM, Tim Martin
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Update
>
> I answered my own question by removing the JAI libraries and then restarted 
> Tomcat
>
> The Server Status now says
>
> Native JAI false
> Native JAI I/O false
>
> Ran the tests again, 3x JMeter and am getting 4.1 secs average
>
> So in this instance the Native Libraries have no benefit.
>
> This goes against alot of the documentation and posts I saw on the bench 
> marking.

I guess you're asking for small images and the raster data you have on
the backend
is small too.

JAI does make a difference also for vector data, up to two times, but
only if the request is fast to
start with. The benchmarks normally have less layers and I guess
simpler styling, as
the responses come back in 50 milliseconds or less (no kidding),
though normally all the
source data is cached in memory by the operating system.
Under those conditions using native JAI makes the difference between
100ms and 50ms,
thus twice as fast.

Cheers
Andrea

-- 
-------------------------------------------------------
Ing. Andrea Aime
GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Tech lead

Via Poggio alle Viti 1187
55054  Massarosa (LU)
Italy

phone: +39 0584 962313
fax:      +39 0584 962313
mob:    +39 333 8128928

http://www.geo-solutions.it
http://geo-solutions.blogspot.com/
http://www.youtube.com/user/GeoSolutionsIT
http://www.linkedin.com/in/andreaaime
http://twitter.com/geowolf

-------------------------------------------------------

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Enable your software for Intel(R) Active Management Technology to meet the
growing manageability and security demands of your customers. Businesses
are taking advantage of Intel(R) vPro (TM) technology - will your software 
be a part of the solution? Download the Intel(R) Manageability Checker 
today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmar
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-users

Reply via email to