On 02/08/2012 02:48 AM, Andrea Aime wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 10:28 PM, John Armstrong<[email protected]>  wrote:
>> Hi, everybody.
>>
>> I'm trying to use GeoServer in an instance where we have thousands of
>> layers to register, with tens to hundreds of new layers each day.  It
>> seemed a perfect situation for dbconfig, but I'm having a lot of
>> difficulty getting that module to work.
>>
>> This can't be all that unusual a use case, though; does anyone here have
>> any suggestions for strategies to make GeoServer scale better so that
>> keeping the catalog around in memory doesn't become too onerous, and
>> loading from disk if the webapp has to be reset doesn't take forever?
> The most common cause of "tons of layers", that is, dealing with 
> time/elevation
> based data, has been taken care of on trunk with the true time and elevation
> support, which means those thousands of layers magically turned back
> to being one.

I wasn't aware that there was any way of registering many time-related 
layers as a single layer within GeoServer; do you have a quick pointer 
to some documentation of how to get this working?

> Changing this is not trivial, but it's orthogonal to having the configuration
> in a database and it's likely to be easier to solve that get a working db
> config layer

Yeah, I'm looking for alternate solutions to the underlying problem; 
considering many layers over time as a single layer may actually be just 
the thing.

Thanks for letting me know about this feature.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keep Your Developer Skills Current with LearnDevNow!
The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers
is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3,
Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-d2d
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-users

Reply via email to