I don't mind switching to a different release model.
My only thought is that what we need (rather then a model) is a release; and
the commitment from project sponsors to make it happen. I suspect the biggest
point in favour of a time released model is the predictability that would lend
for planning resourcing.
Six months is fine; I was also happy with the yearly timeframe we were hitting
if that is easier to manage. I encourage everyone to talk to their employer
before voting on this one.
> Well.. this is it. Opinions?
>
>
Thanks for the detailed, and thoughtful email - my only comment is lets go!
(And yes I will talk to my employer; although I won't hold my breath until
after government year end. As a volunteer I will be find releasing GeoTools if
we can find others to tame GeoServer and its Cite tests).
Jody
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-users
