Hi, I have a huge amount of Vector data that I would like to serve via geoserver, data size would be around 300 GB covering an area of 1/5th of the U.S. There are around 60-70 odd layers and all this data, I would like to serve via WMS and there are SLDs to be applied to the layers for roads,point symbology using SVGs.
Question: 1. I can create shape files(.shp) for this data or put it into oracle spatial , which one would give better performance if we publish via Oracle Spatial datastore or publish via Shapefile datastore for all these vector layer. I understand that shape file has a limitation of 2GB,I will somehow manage to restrict the size to 2GB or increase the layers. 2. We have around 25-30 concurrent users as well on this and would increase in future, what would be better(shp or oracle) 3. Do we really need tile caching for these vector layers or we can bypass it and serve directly from geoserver at all the time if we use shape file? 4. Are there any Oracle connecting/buffering tweaks on Geoserver recomended for these kind of large datasets. Kindly suggest. best Regards dk -- View this message in context: http://osgeo-org.1560.n6.nabble.com/Performance-and-feasibility-using-geoserver-if-map-publishing-is-s-done-using-shapefile-or-oracle-spe-tp5035558.html Sent from the GeoServer - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_feb _______________________________________________ Geoserver-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-users
