I believe the problem that Martin is having is that all the dates are the
epoch (1969-12-31), in other words, the app is not reading the system time,
or the system time (use 'date' on a Unix system) is seriously messed up.
The problem is probably going to me in whatever code is accessing system
time (new Date() for example. Did geoserver change anything about accessing
system time in the 2.4 release?


On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 5:40 AM, Chamberland, Martin <
[email protected]> wrote:

> It’s pretty hard for me to explain correctly because english in not my
> first language.  Let’s try my best.****
>
> ** **
>
> We where running geoserver 2.2.3 for a long time and everything was
> running fine. The only problem (that is not one) we had was  that in the
> output date, there was a “Z” after all date.****
>
> So we were sure that is was a bug, so we decide to update to geoserver 2.4
> (latest one) to fix the issue. Meantine (continuing searching) we discover
> that it’s not a bug but just normal that the “Z” appear there. But as we
> where now running 2.4, now all date that we output from our Oracle database
> are  “1969-12-31”,   every date are the same.****
>
> ** **
>
> I hope i was enough clear,   sorry again for poor English explanation.****
>
> ** **
>
> Martin C.****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> *De :* Jonathan Moules [mailto:[email protected]]
> *Envoyé :* 22 octobre 2013 09:50
> *À :* Chamberland, Martin
> *Cc :* [email protected]
> *Objet :* Re: [Geoserver-users] date BUG 2.4 Geoserver****
>
> ** **
>
> Hi Martin,****
>
> I'm not sure what you're asking here - without further information I
> suspect you won't get any help as it's not clear what you want.****
>
> ** **
>
> Jonathan****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> On 22 October 2013 14:32, Chamberland, Martin <
> [email protected]> wrote:****
>
> Did you have time to take a look at our problem ?****
>
>  ****
>
> Thank’s!****
>
>  ****
>
> Martin C.****
>
>  ****
>
> *De :* Jonathan Moules [mailto:[email protected]]
> *Envoyé :* 21 octobre 2013 08:40
> *À :* Chamberland, Martin
> *Cc :* [email protected]
> *Objet :* Re: [Geoserver-users] date BUG 2.4 Geoserver****
>
>  ****
>
> Hi Martin,****
>
> That's the ISO standard for date formatting.
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_8601****
>
>  ****
>
> Could you be clearer what the problem is for you?****
>
>  ****
>
> Jonathan****
>
>  ****
>
>  ****
>
> On 17 October 2013 19:38, Chamberland, Martin <
> [email protected]> wrote:****
>
> Hi there,****
>
>  ****
>
> We just install the new version Geoserver 2.4  and from now we seem to
> receive some strange date format in our request.****
>
>  ****
>
> All date output create by our trigger look like this:   1969-12-31.****
>
>  ****
>
> Is there maybe a bug in the 2.4 version ?****
>
>  ****
>
> Martin C.****
>
>  ****
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> October Webinars: Code for Performance
> Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance.
> Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most
> from
> the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register >
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60135031&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
> _______________________________________________
> Geoserver-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-users****
>
>  ****
>
>
> This transmission is intended for the named addressee(s) only and may
> contain sensitive or protectively marked material up to RESTRICTED and
> should be handled accordingly. Unless you are the named addressee (or
> authorised to receive it for the addressee) you may not copy or use it, or
> disclose it to anyone else. If you have received this transmission in error
> please notify the sender immediately. All email traffic sent to or from us,
> including without limitation all GCSX traffic, may be subject to recording
> and/or monitoring in accordance with relevant legislation.****
>
> ** **
>
>
> This transmission is intended for the named addressee(s) only and may
> contain sensitive or protectively marked material up to RESTRICTED and
> should be handled accordingly. Unless you are the named addressee (or
> authorised to receive it for the addressee) you may not copy or use it, or
> disclose it to anyone else. If you have received this transmission in error
> please notify the sender immediately. All email traffic sent to or from us,
> including without limitation all GCSX traffic, may be subject to recording
> and/or monitoring in accordance with relevant legislation.****
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> October Webinars: Code for Performance
> Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance.
> Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most
> from
> the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register >
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60135991&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
> _______________________________________________
> Geoserver-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-users
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
October Webinars: Code for Performance
Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance.
Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most from 
the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register >
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60135991&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-users

Reply via email to