On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 3:24 PM, Tom Chadwin <[email protected]>wrote:
> I currently cannot figure out how to get Jetty to bind to the server's
> additional IP address. Should I continue wrestling with Jetty, or should I
> abandon and switch to Tomcat? Is it more robust or flexible for a
> production
> server?
>
Tomcat is better for production, yes, but I'm not sure the web container has
anything to do with the IP binding issue you're having, at lest on Linux,
once a process starts and takes a port, all network interfaces are bound
automatically (I was looking around on the internet, the problem people
normally have is to bind a process to a specific network interface, instead
of all of them).
Cheers
Andrea
--
==
Meet us at GEO Business 2014! in London! Visit http://goo.gl/fES3aK
for more information.
==
Ing. Andrea Aime
@geowolf
Technical Lead
GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Via Poggio alle Viti 1187
55054 Massarosa (LU)
Italy
phone: +39 0584 962313
fax: +39 0584 1660272
mob: +39 339 8844549
http://www.geo-solutions.it
http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it
-------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE
Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos. Get
unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform available.
Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free."
http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-users
