On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 12:37 PM, Hakala Oiva (MTT) <[email protected]>wrote:

>
> You are right of course. No need to call part of the mosaic.
> I was thinking, would a layergroup be useful? No extra plugins, no
> learning curve. Tiffs are not overlapping. It is just a matter of
> restricting available zoom levels or restricting raster's visibility
> depending of a zoom level.
>

A layer group is not smart enough to drop the rasters it does not need, the
image mosaic is, and it's built-in, no need for extra
plugins.
Just put all of your rasters in a single folder, and point the mosaic store
to the folder, if they are similar enough it should work

Cheers
Andrea

-- 
==
Meet us at GEO Business 2014! in London! Visit http://goo.gl/fES3aK
for more information.
==

Ing. Andrea Aime
@geowolf
Technical Lead

GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Via Poggio alle Viti 1187
55054  Massarosa (LU)
Italy
phone: +39 0584 962313
fax: +39 0584 1660272
mob: +39  339 8844549

http://www.geo-solutions.it
http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it

-------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Is your legacy SCM system holding you back? Join Perforce May 7 to find out:
&#149; 3 signs your SCM is hindering your productivity
&#149; Requirements for releasing software faster
&#149; Expert tips and advice for migrating your SCM now
http://p.sf.net/sfu/perforce
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-users

Reply via email to