Hi Ben and Rini,

Yes, with xlink secondary ns and version1.1.0&outputformat=32 it does work! 
Many thanks!!!

I discovered the same problem with others e.g. OGC namespaces like om: sam:, 
and it is despite of the fact that they are in the app-schema-cache directory. 
I needed to add namespace.xml and workspace.xml to make them work.

Regards,
Valentina

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2014 11:36 AM
To: [email protected]; [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [Geoserver-users] App-schema extension: fail to map xlink namespace

Hi Ben, Valentina,

This is a bug indeed. I tried creating secondary namespace for xlink and it 
doesn't work. 
Thanks for reporting. I'll try to fix this before I start my year long leave in 
6 weeks time. 

https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-4894

Cheers
Rini

-----Original Message-----
From: Caradoc-Davies, Ben (Mineral Resources, Kensington)
Sent: Wednesday, 10 September 2014 4:08 PM
To: Valentina Sagris
Cc: [email protected]; Angreani, Rini (Mineral Resources, 
Kensington)
Subject: Re: [Geoserver-users] App-schema extension: fail to map xlink namespace

Valentina,

this looks like the same problem reported here:
http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/xlink-ref-not-well-encoded-in-WFS-response-app-schema-td5002307.html

Are you using WFS 2.0.0 or WFS 1.1.0 with outputformat=gml32? The latter is 
reported to work.

Have you tried defining a secondary namespace for xlink?
http://docs.geoserver.org/stable/en/user/data/app-schema/supported-gml-versions.html#secondary-namespace-for-gml-3-2-1-required

I do not think we found out whether this works.

There have been some recent improvements to app-schema support for WFS 2.0.0; 
it would be good to fix this as well if it is still broken.

Kind regards,
Ben.

On 10/09/14 02:39, Valentina Sagris wrote:
> Hi,
> have defined xlink in mapping file and in the FT schema
> <Namespace>   
> <prefix>xlink</prefix>
> <uri>http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink </uri> </Namespace>
>
> and mapped Client Property
> <AttributeMapping>
> <targetAttribute>om:observedProperty</targetAttribute>
> <ClientProperty>
>               <name>xlink:href</name>
>       
> <value>Concatenate('http://loom-gis.geo.ut.ee/ermas/schemas/sarv/CodeL
> ist_ObservablePropertyValue.xml#',
> observed_property)</value>
> </ClientProperty></AttributeMapping>
>
> but still in the GetFeature resonse I have <om:observedProperty 
> href="http://loom-gis.geo.ut.ee/ermas/schemas/sarv/CodeList_Observable
> PropertyValue.xml#sedimentology_and_lithology"/>
> instead of xlink:href
> can somebody help?
>
> valentina
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: 
> http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/App-schema-extension-fail-to-map-x
> link-namespace-tp5160960.html Sent from the GeoServer - User mailing 
> list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> --------
> Want excitement?
> Manually upgrade your production database.
> When you want reliability, choose Perforce.
> Perforce version control. Predictably reliable.
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=157508191&iu=/4140/ostg.
> clktrk _______________________________________________
> Geoserver-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-users
>

--
Ben Caradoc-Davies <[email protected]> Software Engineer CSIRO 
Mineral Resources Flagship Australian Resources Research Centre


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Meet PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance Requirements with EventLog Analyzer
Achieve PCI DSS 3.0 Compliant Status with Out-of-the-box PCI DSS Reports
Are you Audit-Ready for PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance? Download White paper
Comply to PCI DSS 3.0 Requirement 10 and 11.5 with EventLog Analyzer
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=154622311&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-users

Reply via email to