Hi,

Did you try setting encodeifempty to true:
http://docs.geoserver.org/stable/en/user/data/app-schema/mapping-file.html#encodeifempty-optional

Regards,

Nuno Oliveira

On 05/04/2017 04:46 AM, michaelsexton wrote:
> Hi
>
> I am currently trying to implement EarthResourceML 2.0 er:MineralOccurrence
> and facing a problem with one of the relationships in the schema. For
> reference:
>
> http://www.earthresourceml.net/earthresourceml/2.0/doc/ERML_HTML_Documentation/
>
> A er:MineralOccurrence has many er:oreAmounts, which map to a concrete class
> of the abstract er:OreMeasure (in my model, either er:Reserve or
> er:Resource). The er:oreAmount is mandatory but nillable. Here is the
> snippet from my er_MineralOccurrence.xml mapping file, which maps the table
> ER_MINERALOCCURRENCE
>
> <AttributeMapping>
>    <targetAttribute>er:oreAmount</targetAttribute>
>    <sourceExpression>
>      <OCQL>ENO</OCQL>
>      <linkElement>er:Resource</linkElement>
>      <linkField>FEATURE_LINK[2]</linkField>
>    </sourceExpression>
> </AttributeMapping>
> <AttributeMapping>
>    <targetAttribute>er:oreAmount</targetAttribute>
>    <sourceExpression>
>      <OCQL>ENO</OCQL>
>      <linkElement>er:Reserve</linkElement>
>      <linkField>FEATURE_LINK[3]</linkField>
>    </sourceExpression>
> </AttributeMapping>
>
> These map to the files er_Reserve.xml and er_Resource.xml, which themselves
> map to table ER_RESERVE and ER_RESOURCE.
>
> The problem is when there are no Resources or Reserves for a given
> MineralOccurrence. I thought I could cheat by adding another
> AttributeMapping that inserts a ClientProperty with name and value of
> xsi:nil='true'. But all this does is add the ClientProperty to the last
> er:Reserve attribute and makes it invlaid.
>
> What are the solutions for this problem? As I see it there are three:
>
> 1. An as yet unknown solution (to me) in the mapping config that allows an
> nil artefact to populate even when it isn't necessary, that requires to
> change to the physical data model.
> 2. A change to the physical data model in our RDBMS that populates
> ER_MINERALOCCURRENCE with a 'oremeasure' field that determines whether a
> feature chain is used via an if_then_else in the mapping file. This seems
> fairly suboptimal.
> 3. A change to the boneheaded requirement of everything being mandatory in
> the ERML standard, especially when the real world objects it is supposed to
> model cannot meet that mandatory requirement (since when do small mineral
> occurrence outcrops have an oreAmount????)
>
> Any help would be greatly appreciated, this is driving me up the wall.
>
> Thanks
>
> Michael
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: 
> http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/Mapping-mandatory-but-nillable-attributes-that-are-feature-chained-in-the-case-where-the-data-doesn-t-tp5319334.html
> Sent from the GeoServer - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> _______________________________________________
> Geoserver-users mailing list
> Geoserver-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-users
>

-- 
==
GeoServer Professional Services from the experts!
Visit http://goo.gl/it488V for more information.
==
Nuno Miguel Carvalho Oliveira
@nmcoliveira
Software Engineer

GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Via di Montramito 3/A
55054  Massarosa (LU)
Italy

phone: +39 0584 962313
fax:   +39 0584 1660272
mob:   +39  333 8128928

http://www.geo-solutions.it
http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it

-------------------------------------------------------

AVVERTENZE AI SENSI DEL D.Lgs. 196/2003
Le informazioni contenute in questo messaggio di posta elettronica e/o nel/i 
file/s allegato/i sono
da considerarsi strettamente riservate. Il loro utilizzo è consentito 
esclusivamente al destinatario del messaggio, per le finalità indicate
nel messaggio stesso. Qualora riceviate questo messaggio senza esserne il 
destinatario, Vi preghiamo cortesemente di darcene notizia via e
-mail e di procedere alla distruzione del messaggio stesso, cancellandolo dal 
Vostro sistema. Conservare il messaggio stesso, divulgarlo
anche in parte, distribuirlo ad altri soggetti, copiarlo, od utilizzarlo per 
finalità diverse, costituisce comportamento contrario ai
principi dettati dal D.Lgs. 196/2003.
  
The information in this message and/or attachments, is intended solely for the 
attention and use of
the named addressee(s) and may be confidential or proprietary in nature or 
covered by the provisions of privacy act (Legislative Decree
June, 30 2003, no.196 - Italy's New Data Protection Code).Any use not in accord 
with its purpose, any disclosure, reproduction, copying,
distribution, or either dissemination, either whole or partial, is strictly 
forbidden except previous formal approval of the named
addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, please contact immediately 
the sender by telephone, fax or e-mail and delete the
information in this message that has been received in error. The sender does 
not give any warranty or accept liability as the content,
accuracy or completeness of sent messages and accepts no responsibility  for 
changes made after they were sent or for other risks which
arise as a result of e-mail transmission, viruses, etc.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-users mailing list
Geoserver-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-users

Reply via email to