What do you mean by “better performance”? What are you measuring? How are you 
measuring?  What performance tuning have you done on your geoserver?


What are you really trying to do? Understand the implementation or just make 
WMS run faster?




From: Julierme Pinheiro [mailto:juliermeopensourcedevelo...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Saturday, 3 February 2018 5:50 AM
To: geoserver-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Geoserver-users] wmts layer request


Dear all,

First of all, my apologies if my question has been already discussed here.

I created some wms/wmts services for GeoTIFF files using geoserver. My computer 
is running Ubuntu 14.04 LTS (Memory: 23 GB e Processor: Intel® Xeon(R) CPU 
X5660 @ 2.80GHz × 12).

I am loading theses services in QGIS and realized that the wms connection is 
slower than the wmts. I did not understand why wms is slower because I set 
Caching Defaults (box checked) Enable direct integration with GeoServer WMS. 

In my case, the wmts is having a better performance in Qgis. 

Could someone explain me why wmts has a better performance, even though is 
integrated with the wms? 

Thank you for your time in advance




Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
Geoserver-users mailing list

Please make sure you read the following two resources before posting to this 
- Earning your support instead of buying it, but Ian Turton: 
- The GeoServer user list posting guidelines: 

If you want to request a feature or an improvement, also see this: 


Reply via email to