What do you mean by “better performance”? What are you measuring? How are you
measuring? What performance tuning have you done on your geoserver?
What are you really trying to do? Understand the implementation or just make
WMS run faster?
Brad
From: Julierme Pinheiro [mailto:juliermeopensourcedevelo...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, 3 February 2018 5:50 AM
To: geoserver-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Geoserver-users] wmts layer request
Dear all,
First of all, my apologies if my question has been already discussed here.
I created some wms/wmts services for GeoTIFF files using geoserver. My computer
is running Ubuntu 14.04 LTS (Memory: 23 GB e Processor: Intel® Xeon(R) CPU
X5660 @ 2.80GHz × 12).
I am loading theses services in QGIS and realized that the wms connection is
slower than the wmts. I did not understand why wms is slower because I set
Caching Defaults (box checked) Enable direct integration with GeoServer WMS.
In my case, the wmts is having a better performance in Qgis.
Could someone explain me why wmts has a better performance, even though is
integrated with the wms?
Thank you for your time in advance
Julierme
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-users mailing list
Please make sure you read the following two resources before posting to this
list:
- Earning your support instead of buying it, but Ian Turton:
http://www.ianturton.com/talks/foss4g.html#/
- The GeoServer user list posting guidelines:
http://geoserver.org/comm/userlist-guidelines.html
If you want to request a feature or an improvement, also see this:
https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/wiki/Successfully-requesting-and-integrating-new-features-and-improvements-in-GeoServer
Geoserver-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-users