Thank you for your questions. My replies to each follow:

  *   Did you try switching the sorting direction, was the result still not 
what you expected?
Yes, I tried many different approaches and the results never varied.


  *   Could you show us actual vs expected result?
Within this layer, we have multiple classes designated by the gs field. For 
instance, PA, LA, etc. We would like that in the few instance in which two 
point fall in the same location for the well designated as PA to draw rather 
than the one designated as LA. To do this, we tried the sorting option 
descending on the gs field.


  *   Is your data source a shapefile?
Yes, the data source is a shapefile.


Also, as a further test, what happens if just before closing your Graphic tag 
you add this:

Adding the opacity doesn’t make the other feature appear. I just discovered 
something ever more peculiar that may be the cause of the issue. If I 
completely remove the rule with <ogc:Literal>LA</ogc:Literal>, the point in the 
same location doesn’t draw. However, if I execute a CQL query, it suddenly 
appears.

I am now further baffled.

Thank you,

Todd Fagin

Oklahoma Natural Heritage Inventory/
Oklahoma Biological Survey

From: Andrea Aime [mailto:andrea.a...@geo-solutions.it]
Sent: Sunday, September 2, 2018 2:12 AM
To: Fagin, Todd D. <tfa...@ou.edu>
Cc: GeoServer Mailing List List <geoserver-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Geoserver-users] SLD drawing order

Hi,
a few questions to try get this sorted out:

  *   Did you try switching the sorting direction, was the result still not 
what you expected?
  *   Could you show us actual vs expected result?
  *   Is your data source a shapefile?
Also, as a further test, what happens if just before closing your Graphic tag 
you add this:

   <Opacity>0.99</Opacity>
</Graphic>


On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 10:57 PM Fagin, Todd D. 
<tfa...@ou.edu<mailto:tfa...@ou.edu>> wrote:
Greetings,

I know this is an issue that has been addressed before, but we are having some 
issues and am hoping for guidance.

We have a point layer that has, in at least one instance, two points at the 
exact some location. Optimally, if would be best if both symbols rendered in a 
“stacked” fashion. However, only one of the features is showing. The next best 
option would be to prioritize the point drawn based on attribute value. We have 
used the <FeatureTypeStyle> tag, but the rendering is still not placing 
priority as we have indicated. I have a snippet of the SLD below.

Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.

<FeatureTypeStyle>
        <Rule>
          <Name>Type 1</Name>
          <Title>Type 1</Title>
          <MaxScaleDenominator>750000</MaxScaleDenominator>
          <ogc:Filter>
            <ogc:PropertyIsEqualTo>
              <ogc:PropertyName>gs</ogc:PropertyName>
              <ogc:Literal>LA</ogc:Literal>
            </ogc:PropertyIsEqualTo>
          </ogc:Filter>
          <PointSymbolizer>
            <Graphic>
              <ExternalGraphic>
                <OnlineResource xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="UT/LA.svg" />
                <Format>image/svg+xml</Format>
              </ExternalGraphic>
              <Size>
                <ogc:Literal>10</ogc:Literal>
              </Size>
            </Graphic>
          </PointSymbolizer>
        </Rule>
      </FeatureTypeStyle>
      <FeatureTypeStyle>
        <Rule>
          <Name>Type 2</Name>
          <Title>Type 2</Title>
          <MaxScaleDenominator>750000</MaxScaleDenominator>
          <ogc:Filter>
            <ogc:PropertyIsEqualTo>
              <ogc:PropertyName>gs</ogc:PropertyName>
              <ogc:Literal>PA</ogc:Literal>
            </ogc:PropertyIsEqualTo>
          </ogc:Filter>
          <PointSymbolizer>
            <Graphic>
              <ExternalGraphic>
                <OnlineResource xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="UT/PA.svg" />
                <Format>image/svg+xml</Format>
              </ExternalGraphic>
              <Size>
                <ogc:Literal>16</ogc:Literal>
              </Size>
            </Graphic>
          </PointSymbolizer>
        </Rule>
      </FeatureTypeStyle>



Thank you,

Todd

Todd Fagin

Oklahoma Natural Heritage Inventory/
Oklahoma Biological Survey

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! 
http://sdm.link/slashdot<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__sdm.link_slashdot&d=DwMFaQ&c=qKdtBuuu6dQK9MsRUVJ2DPXW6oayO8fu4TfEHS8sGNk&r=5fn9Z6IrrvMEqCEFIvviYg&m=0StXmC9OM4SHOlDHUtLL3WW_zmQYtsgmkzbvkxb7Yuk&s=gODXQlXVrPgy8Hd5DRwhDJnxSpI3YenURN7OHdL50og&e=>_______________________________________________
Geoserver-users mailing list

Please make sure you read the following two resources before posting to this 
list:
- Earning your support instead of buying it, but Ian Turton: 
http://www.ianturton.com/talks/foss4g.html#/<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.ianturton.com_talks_foss4g.html-23_&d=DwMFaQ&c=qKdtBuuu6dQK9MsRUVJ2DPXW6oayO8fu4TfEHS8sGNk&r=5fn9Z6IrrvMEqCEFIvviYg&m=0StXmC9OM4SHOlDHUtLL3WW_zmQYtsgmkzbvkxb7Yuk&s=cxb2qk7hC1avNLAzsP8mOr_juo9QHjQxB0lwOref0bY&e=>
- The GeoServer user list posting guidelines: 
http://geoserver.org/comm/userlist-guidelines.html<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__geoserver.org_comm_userlist-2Dguidelines.html&d=DwMFaQ&c=qKdtBuuu6dQK9MsRUVJ2DPXW6oayO8fu4TfEHS8sGNk&r=5fn9Z6IrrvMEqCEFIvviYg&m=0StXmC9OM4SHOlDHUtLL3WW_zmQYtsgmkzbvkxb7Yuk&s=QA9Uh5f1uY9pFDffYt9aP1u-Bb7pbi2JzMKiqZUXUSQ&e=>

If you want to request a feature or an improvement, also see this: 
https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/wiki/Successfully-requesting-and-integrating-new-features-and-improvements-in-GeoServer<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_geoserver_geoserver_wiki_Successfully-2Drequesting-2Dand-2Dintegrating-2Dnew-2Dfeatures-2Dand-2Dimprovements-2Din-2DGeoServer&d=DwMFaQ&c=qKdtBuuu6dQK9MsRUVJ2DPXW6oayO8fu4TfEHS8sGNk&r=5fn9Z6IrrvMEqCEFIvviYg&m=0StXmC9OM4SHOlDHUtLL3WW_zmQYtsgmkzbvkxb7Yuk&s=CvXYmzOi6wFgh3p257_KAFRxuN_feHiSr1MfoqctBx0&e=>


Geoserver-users@lists.sourceforge.net<mailto:Geoserver-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-users<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.sourceforge.net_lists_listinfo_geoserver-2Dusers&d=DwMFaQ&c=qKdtBuuu6dQK9MsRUVJ2DPXW6oayO8fu4TfEHS8sGNk&r=5fn9Z6IrrvMEqCEFIvviYg&m=0StXmC9OM4SHOlDHUtLL3WW_zmQYtsgmkzbvkxb7Yuk&s=IhvEOsBFIZTEHkk15qMPsfljLXufKqYhCljE7W1dqTQ&e=>


--

Regards, Andrea Aime == GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit 
http://goo.gl/it488V<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__goo.gl_it488V&d=DwMFaQ&c=qKdtBuuu6dQK9MsRUVJ2DPXW6oayO8fu4TfEHS8sGNk&r=5fn9Z6IrrvMEqCEFIvviYg&m=0StXmC9OM4SHOlDHUtLL3WW_zmQYtsgmkzbvkxb7Yuk&s=PGW_6_jCGWiI-n9CNJNYZZTsvl1EHpYwS9pZIRJ9mk8&e=>
 for more information. == Ing. Andrea Aime @geowolf Technical Lead GeoSolutions 
S.A.S. Via di Montramito 3/A 55054 Massarosa (LU) phone: +39 0584 962313 fax: 
+39 0584 1660272 mob: +39 339 8844549 
http://www.geo-solutions.it<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.geo-2Dsolutions.it&d=DwMFaQ&c=qKdtBuuu6dQK9MsRUVJ2DPXW6oayO8fu4TfEHS8sGNk&r=5fn9Z6IrrvMEqCEFIvviYg&m=0StXmC9OM4SHOlDHUtLL3WW_zmQYtsgmkzbvkxb7Yuk&s=9f80Htx10-BqkZ2V8lH7FIOMXQiB8p63fP_gZJA71gE&e=>
 
http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__twitter.com_geosolutions-5Fit&d=DwMFaQ&c=qKdtBuuu6dQK9MsRUVJ2DPXW6oayO8fu4TfEHS8sGNk&r=5fn9Z6IrrvMEqCEFIvviYg&m=0StXmC9OM4SHOlDHUtLL3WW_zmQYtsgmkzbvkxb7Yuk&s=ynew_4tWyqP5CLCwpflwgWYrNxGlOtg_QxTFtOK4jKo&e=>
 ------------------------------------------------------- Con riferimento alla 
normativa sul trattamento dei dati personali (Reg. UE 2016/679 - Regolamento 
generale sulla protezione dei dati “GDPR”), si precisa che ogni circostanza 
inerente alla presente email (il suo contenuto, gli eventuali allegati, etc.) è 
un dato la cui conoscenza è riservata al/i solo/i destinatario/i indicati dallo 
scrivente. Se il messaggio Le è giunto per errore, è tenuta/o a cancellarlo, 
ogni altra operazione è illecita. Le sarei comunque grato se potesse darmene 
notizia. This email is intended only for the person or entity to which it is 
addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or 
otherwise protected from disclosure. We remind that - as provided by European 
Regulation 2016/679 “GDPR” - copying, dissemination or use of this e-mail or 
the information herein by anyone other than the intended recipient is 
prohibited. If you have received this email by mistake, please notify us 
immediately by telephone or e-mail.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-users mailing list

Please make sure you read the following two resources before posting to this 
list:
- Earning your support instead of buying it, but Ian Turton: 
http://www.ianturton.com/talks/foss4g.html#/
- The GeoServer user list posting guidelines: 
http://geoserver.org/comm/userlist-guidelines.html

If you want to request a feature or an improvement, also see this: 
https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/wiki/Successfully-requesting-and-integrating-new-features-and-improvements-in-GeoServer


Geoserver-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-users

Reply via email to