Hi,
There are some missing information from what you wrote to the list, and as 
always, if possible concrete examples help (especially if your geoserver is 
public)
My assumptions:    You are working with WMS that has a SLD that filters various 
elements in the dataset in order to compose clean maps    The SLD is probably 
scale dependennt (various scales show various types of data).
Unknowns:    The application/framework you are using to filter the data via WFS 
       
What you would like to see happen is going to be difficult, and is not 
necesserily supported out of the box:    It is my understanding that the WFS 
service in geoserver doesn't communicate/care/bother with the SLD since it was 
only designed for use with image generation (and GtFeatureInfo, which also 
relies on retrieving data based on rendered output). 
    You would basically have to pass the currently active filter in the SLD to 
the WFS in order to first filter out "unwanted/invisible" features, and then 
use the CQL Filter, and WFS feature types are not scale-dependent
    Depending on the application you are using this might be more or less 
achievable.     A published Geoserver "layer" can be used and reused many times 
in the SLD, giving you the "WMS rendering layers", but the published dataset 
will only be a single FeatureType in the WFS (publishing all the data from the 
source).
    Common practice would have you designing a custom "search" layer where only 
the "searchable" features should be configured.

Sorin RUSU
 

    Pe ‎marți‎, ‎25‎ ‎septembrie‎ ‎2018‎ ‎17‎:‎26‎:‎15‎ ‎EEST, carrbrpoa 
<[email protected]> a scris:  
 
 I'm trying to "search" for things in a GeoServer published layer, through an
webmapping app.

For that, I'm using WFS/GetFeature, applying CQL Filters as needed. The
problem is that the style of the published layer omits some features (SLD's
rules) and seems that WFS/GetFeature is not aware of that.

Based on that, the results of the WFS/GetFeature can point to features
otherwise hidden for SLD's rules (what I don't want, actually).

Do you have any suggestions for that?

Thanks in advance!



--
Sent from: http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/GeoServer-User-f3786390.html


_______________________________________________
Geoserver-users mailing list

Please make sure you read the following two resources before posting to this 
list:
- Earning your support instead of buying it, but Ian Turton: 
http://www.ianturton.com/talks/foss4g.html#/
- The GeoServer user list posting guidelines: 
http://geoserver.org/comm/userlist-guidelines.html

If you want to request a feature or an improvement, also see this: 
https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/wiki/Successfully-requesting-and-integrating-new-features-and-improvements-in-GeoServer


[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-users
  
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-users mailing list

Please make sure you read the following two resources before posting to this 
list:
- Earning your support instead of buying it, but Ian Turton: 
http://www.ianturton.com/talks/foss4g.html#/
- The GeoServer user list posting guidelines: 
http://geoserver.org/comm/userlist-guidelines.html

If you want to request a feature or an improvement, also see this: 
https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/wiki/Successfully-requesting-and-integrating-new-features-and-improvements-in-GeoServer


[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-users

Reply via email to