Jody,
Sorry about that I was not aware of these rules. Cheers, Brad…. From: Jody Garnett <jody.garn...@gmail.com> Sent: 10 February 2020 16:55 To: Brad Spencer <b...@numaps.com.au> Subject: Re: [Geoserver-users] Geoserver 2.11.2 Please keep our policy in mind about keeping communication on the list. I am sorry I accidentally replied to you directly (made a mistake using my phone). Many folks, including my employer, offer direct email support commercially. By keeping thing on the list, like how to figure out the logs, we help people doing a web search and participate in the community. On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 5:06 AM Brad Spencer <b...@numaps.com.au <mailto:b...@numaps.com.au> > wrote: Jody, I simply do not understand the Geoserver logs. They make no sense to me. Would it help if I just cut and pasted to you into an email? Cheers, Brad…. From: Jody Garnett <jody.garn...@gmail.com <mailto:jody.garn...@gmail.com> > Sent: 10 February 2020 12:23 To: Brad Spencer <b...@numaps.com.au <mailto:b...@numaps.com.au> > Cc: geoserver-users@lists.sourceforge.net <mailto:geoserver-users@lists.sourceforge.net> Subject: Re: [Geoserver-users] Geoserver 2.11.2 Can you increase the logging and check what query is being generated. What data store are you using? On Sun, Feb 9, 2020 at 11:48 PM Brad Spencer <b...@numaps.com.au <mailto:b...@numaps.com.au> > wrote: Guys, Can anyone please shed some light on this geoserver problem for me? Cheers, Brad…. From: Brad Spencer <b...@numaps.com.au <mailto:b...@numaps.com.au> > Sent: 06 February 2020 10:44 To: 'geoserver-users@lists.sourceforge.net' <geoserver-users@lists.sourceforge.net <mailto:geoserver-users@lists.sourceforge.net> > Subject: Geoserver 2.11.2 I am trying to do a getFeature request using a CQL_FILTER. The filter has two components a spatial filter defined as Within(geometry,POLYGON((144.7434 -37.9707,144.7434 -37.6572,145.1608 -37.6572,145.1608 -37.9707,144.7434 -37.9707))) plus an attribute filter component persons_usually_resident > 400. This should return over 100 polygon features. I get zero features returned when I should get over 100 returned. http://13.55.5.169:8008/geoserver/abs/wfs?REQUEST=GetFeature <http://13.55.5.169:8008/geoserver/abs/wfs?REQUEST=GetFeature&SERVICE=WFS&VERSION=1.1.0&TYPENAME=2016MBmeshblocks&OUTPUTFORMAT=application/json&CQL_FILTER=Within(geometry,POLYGON((144.7434> &SERVICE=WFS&VERSION=1.1.0&TYPENAME=2016MBmeshblocks&OUTPUTFORMAT=application/json&CQL_FILTER=Within(geometry,POLYGON((144.7434 -37.9707,144.7434 -37.6572,145.1608 -37.6572,145.1608 -37.9707,144.7434 -37.9707))) AND persons_usually_resident > 400 I have also trued URL encoded CQL_Filter: http://13.55.5.169:8008/geoserver/abs/wms?REQUEST=GetFeature <http://13.55.5.169:8008/geoserver/abs/wms?REQUEST=GetFeature&SERVICE=WFS&VERSION=1.1.0&TYPENAME=2016MBmeshblocks&OUTPUTFORMAT=application/json&CQL_FILTER=Within(geometry%2CPOLYGON((144.7434%20-37.9707%2C144.7434%20-37.6572%2C145.1608%20-37.6572%2C145.1608%20-37.9707%2C144.7434%20-37.9707)))%20AND%20component%20persons_usually_resident%20%3E%20400> &SERVICE=WFS&VERSION=1.1.0&TYPENAME=2016MBmeshblocks&OUTPUTFORMAT=application/json&CQL_FILTER=Within(geometry%2CPOLYGON((144.7434%20-37.9707%2C144.7434%20-37.6572%2C145.1608%20-37.6572%2C145.1608%20-37.9707%2C144.7434%20-37.9707)))%20AND%20component%20persons_usually_resident%20%3E%20400 I know the spatial data is correct as I have used a BBOX CQL_FILTER with the same geometry and it works fine returning the correct data number of features and no urlencoding. That also validates we are looking at the correct layer and geometry. This also returns about the same number of features as the spatial filters should be returning - there will be minor differences tho due to the Within is a little different to BBOX. http://13.55.5.169:8008/geoserver/abs/wfs?REQUEST=GetFeature <http://13.55.5.169:8008/geoserver/abs/wfs?REQUEST=GetFeature&SERVICE=WFS&VERSION=1.0.0&TYPENAME=2016MBmeshblocks&OUTPUTFORMAT=application/json&CQL_FILTER=BBOX(geometry,144.7434,-37.9707,145.1608,-37.6572)%20AND%20persons_usually_resident%20%3E%20400> &SERVICE=WFS&VERSION=1.0.0&TYPENAME=2016MBmeshblocks&OUTPUTFORMAT=application/json&CQL_FILTER=BBOX(geometry,144.7434,-37.9707,145.1608,-37.6572)%20AND%20persons_usually_resident%20%3E%20400 I have also checked the syntax of the WKT POLYGON((144.7434 -37.9707,144.7434 -37.6572,145.1608 -37.6572,145.1608 -37.9707,144.7434 -37.9707)) via https://arthur-e.github.io/Wicket/sandbox-gmaps3.html so I feel confident that is correct. In addition I tried an OGC filter with no luck. http://13.55.5.169:8008/geoserver/abs/wfs?REQUEST=GetFeature <http://13.55.5.169:8008/geoserver/abs/wfs?REQUEST=GetFeature&SERVICE=WFS&VERSION=1.1.0&TYPENAME=2016MBmeshblocks&OUTPUTFORMAT=application/json&FILTER=%3cFilter%3e%3cAnd%3e%3cPropertyIsGreaterThan%3e%3cPropertyName%3epersons_usually_resident%3c/PropertyName%3e%3cLiteral%3e400%3c/Literal%3e%3c/PropertyIsGreaterThan%3e%3cWithin%3e%3cPropertyName%3egeometry%3c/PropertyName%3e%3cPolygon%3e%3couterBoundaryIs%3e%3cLinearRing%3e%3ccoordinates> &SERVICE=WFS&VERSION=1.1.0&TYPENAME=2016MBmeshblocks&OUTPUTFORMAT=application/json&FILTER=<Filter><And><PropertyIsGreaterThan><PropertyName>persons_usually_resident</PropertyName><Literal>400</Literal></PropertyIsGreaterThan><Within><PropertyName>geometry</PropertyName><Polygon><outerBoundaryIs><LinearRing><coordinates decimal='.' cs=':' ts=' '>144.7434:-37.9707 144.7434:-37.6572 145.1608:-37.6572 145.1608:-37.9707 144.7434:-37.9707</coordinates></LinearRing></outerBoundaryIs></Polygon></Within></And></Filter> I need to be able to support either a OGC or CQL spatial filter with a variable sized search polygon which could be a circle of 40 points or a user digitized arbitrary area. I can do this on a Cubewerx WFS service using OGC Filter but am really struggling with Geoserver 2.11.2. The only thing I can think of is that the access control setting on our geoserver may be set incorrectly. http://13.55.5.169:8008/geoserver/abs/wfs?request=getcapabilities <http://13.55.5.169:8008/geoserver/abs/wfs?request=getcapabilities&service=WFS> &service=WFS specifically... <fes:Constraint name="ImplementsSpatialFilter"> <ows:NoValues/> <ows:DefaultValue>FALSE</ows:DefaultValue> </fes:Constraint> If this is a problem how can I change this default constraint? We are also thinking of upgrading to a newer version of geoserver but cannot understand why these requests are ignoring the spatial filters? Cheers, Brad Spencer Managing Director http://www.numaps.com.au/ mob: 0404 841 131 BradArt <https://www.facebook.com/pg/numaps.com.au/photos/?ref=page_internal> _______________________________________________ Geoserver-users mailing list Please make sure you read the following two resources before posting to this list: - Earning your support instead of buying it, but Ian Turton: http://www.ianturton.com/talks/foss4g.html#/ - The GeoServer user list posting guidelines: http://geoserver.org/comm/userlist-guidelines.html If you want to request a feature or an improvement, also see this: https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/wiki/Successfully-requesting-and-integrating-new-features-and-improvements-in-GeoServer Geoserver-users@lists.sourceforge.net <mailto:Geoserver-users@lists.sourceforge.net> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-users -- -- Jody Garnett -- -- Jody Garnett
_______________________________________________ Geoserver-users mailing list Please make sure you read the following two resources before posting to this list: - Earning your support instead of buying it, but Ian Turton: http://www.ianturton.com/talks/foss4g.html#/ - The GeoServer user list posting guidelines: http://geoserver.org/comm/userlist-guidelines.html If you want to request a feature or an improvement, also see this: https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/wiki/Successfully-requesting-and-integrating-new-features-and-improvements-in-GeoServer Geoserver-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-users
