Should this be a bug then? Thanks, Dan
On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 11:51 AM Mark Prins <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>> >>>> Dan Hooper <[email protected]> escreveu no dia sexta, 5/06/2020 >>>> à(s) 15:36: >>>> >>>>> WFS works however it does not do any geometry simplification and as >>>>> such the responses are much larger than the WMS responses. >>>>> >>>>> > I think simplification may lead to invalid geometries which would then be > skipped by the renderer > > -- > Disclaimer; > This message is just a reflection of what I thought at the time of > sending. The message may contain information that is not intended for you > or that you don't understand. > _______________________________________________ > Geoserver-users mailing list > > Please make sure you read the following two resources before posting to > this list: > - Earning your support instead of buying it, but Ian Turton: > http://www.ianturton.com/talks/foss4g.html#/ > - The GeoServer user list posting guidelines: > http://geoserver.org/comm/userlist-guidelines.html > > If you want to request a feature or an improvement, also see this: > https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/wiki/Successfully-requesting-and-integrating-new-features-and-improvements-in-GeoServer > > > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-users >
_______________________________________________ Geoserver-users mailing list Please make sure you read the following two resources before posting to this list: - Earning your support instead of buying it, but Ian Turton: http://www.ianturton.com/talks/foss4g.html#/ - The GeoServer user list posting guidelines: http://geoserver.org/comm/userlist-guidelines.html If you want to request a feature or an improvement, also see this: https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/wiki/Successfully-requesting-and-integrating-new-features-and-improvements-in-GeoServer [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-users
