This has been going on for a while, snowballing... a number of different
developers
have been providing patches during the last few years, each time adding
tests, and each
time apparently fixing something but breaking something else.
It seems we did not have enough tests covering M and Z, and we still do not,
despite the fair number of test methods in here:
https://github.com/geotools/geotools/blob/main/modules/plugin/shapefile/src/test/java/org/geotools/data/shapefile/shp/ZMHandlersTest.java

Please open a ticket, attach a sample shapefile along with requests that
make the system fail.
Hopefully it will be picked up during one of the future bug fix code
sprints.

Cheers
Andrea

On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 10:16 AM stefano pezzi <stefanope...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi all,
> I'm experiencing problems querying with WFS's GetFeature layers based on
> shapefile with geometry with more than 2 dimensions.
>
> My test environment:
>
>    - Windows 10, Tomcat 9.0.54, Java jdk-11.0.12.7-hotspot (Adoptium by
>    Eclipse Foundation)
>
> My test data
>
>    - polygonal shapefile elaborated with ogr2ogr to produce 2D, 3D (xyz &
>    xym) and 4D geometry (xyzm). The original shapefile was a 4D geometry
>    coming from ESRI's applications.
>       - ogr2ogr -dim XYZM  OrigEdificiXYZM.shp EdificiXYZM.shp
>       - ogr2ogr -dim XYZ  OrigEdificiXYZM.shp EdificiXYZ.shp
>       - ogr2ogr -dim XYM  OrigEdificiXYZM.shp EdificiXYM.shp
>       - ogr2ogr -dim XY  OrigEdificiXYZM.shp EdificiXY.shp
>
> My test query:
>
> http://localhost:8089/geoserver/wfs?service=WFS&version=2.0.0&request=GetFeature&typeName=common:EdificiXYM&bbox=493318,
> 5048991, 493319, 5048992&srsName=EPSG:32632
>
> I launched with PostMan the WFS GetFeature with a bbox filter and I got
> this results on different version of GeoServer:
>
> *GeoServer*
>
> *3D *(XYZ/XYM)
>
> *4D *(XYZM)
>
> *2D *(XY)
>
> 2.20.0
>
> O
>
> O
>
> ü
>
> 2.19.3
>
> O
>
> O
>
> ü
>
> 2.18.5
>
> O
>
> O
>
> ü
>
> 2.17.5
>
> O
>
> O
>
> ü
>
> 2.16.5
>
> ü
>
> ü
>
> ü
>
> 2.16.0
>
> ü
>
> ü
>
> ü
>
> The XYZM and XYZ test cases give the same error "*Invalid ordinate index:
> 3." *
> Excerpt from logfile:
> java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Invalid ordinate index: 3
> at org.locationtech.jts.geom.Coordinate.setM(Coordinate.java:218)
> at
> org.locationtech.jts.geom.impl.PackedCoordinateSequence.getCoordinate(PackedCoordinateSequence.java:116)
> at
> org.locationtech.jts.operation.predicate.RectangleIntersectsSegmentVisitor.checkIntersectionWithSegments(RectangleIntersects.java:327)
> at
> org.locationtech.jts.operation.predicate.RectangleIntersectsSegmentVisitor.checkIntersectionWithLineStrings(RectangleIntersects.java:317)
> at
> org.locationtech.jts.operation.predicate.RectangleIntersectsSegmentVisitor.visit(RectangleIntersects.java:310)
> at
> org.locationtech.jts.geom.util.ShortCircuitedGeometryVisitor.applyTo(ShortCircuitedGeometryVisitor.java:35)
> at
> org.locationtech.jts.operation.predicate.RectangleIntersects.intersects(RectangleIntersects.java:110)
> at
> org.locationtech.jts.operation.predicate.RectangleIntersects.intersects(RectangleIntersects.java:58)
> at org.locationtech.jts.geom.Geometry.intersects(Geometry.java:754)
> at org.geotools.filter.spatial.BBOXImpl.basicEvaluate(BBOXImpl.java:118)
> at org.geotools.filter.spatial.BBOXImpl.evaluateInternal(BBOXImpl.java:107)
> ....
>
> The XYM test case gives an  "*Index 69 out of bounds for length 69"*
> Excerpt from logfile:
> java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: Index 69 out of bounds for
> length 69
> at
> org.geotools.geometry.jts.LiteCoordinateSequence.setOrdinate(LiteCoordinateSequence.java:224)
> at
> org.geotools.data.shapefile.shp.PolygonHandler.readCoordinates(PolygonHandler.java:315)
> at
> org.geotools.data.shapefile.shp.PolygonHandler.read(PolygonHandler.java:142)
> at
> org.geotools.data.shapefile.shp.ShapefileReader$Record.shape(ShapefileReader.java:114)
> at
> org.geotools.data.shapefile.ShapefileFeatureReader.getGeometry(ShapefileFeatureReader.java:239)
> at
> org.geotools.data.shapefile.IndexedShapefileFeatureReader.hasNext(IndexedShapefileFeatureReader.java:86)
> at
> org.geotools.data.ReTypeFeatureReader.hasNext(ReTypeFeatureReader.java:191)
> at org.geotools.data.MaxFeatureReader.hasNext(MaxFeatureReader.java:82)
> ...
>
> WMS GetMap *works fine* with all types of geometries.
>
> It's clearly a GeoTools error and though I found information about this
> having been already solved (
> https://osgeo-org.atlassian.net/browse/GEOT-6599) I'm still having
> issues.
>
> Stefano
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Geoserver-users mailing list
>
> Please make sure you read the following two resources before posting to
> this list:
> - Earning your support instead of buying it, but Ian Turton:
> http://www.ianturton.com/talks/foss4g.html#/
> - The GeoServer user list posting guidelines:
> http://geoserver.org/comm/userlist-guidelines.html
>
> If you want to request a feature or an improvement, also see this:
> https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/wiki/Successfully-requesting-and-integrating-new-features-and-improvements-in-GeoServer
>
>
> Geoserver-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-users
>


-- 

Regards,

Andrea Aime

==
GeoServer Professional Services from the experts!

Visit http://bit.ly/gs-services-us for more information.
==

Ing. Andrea Aime
@geowolf
Technical Lead

GeoSolutions Group
phone: +39 0584 962313

fax:     +39 0584 1660272

mob:   +39  333 8128928

https://www.geosolutionsgroup.com/

http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it

-------------------------------------------------------

Con riferimento alla normativa sul trattamento dei dati personali (Reg. UE
2016/679 - Regolamento generale sulla protezione dei dati “GDPR”), si
precisa che ogni circostanza inerente alla presente email (il suo
contenuto, gli eventuali allegati, etc.) è un dato la cui conoscenza è
riservata al/i solo/i destinatario/i indicati dallo scrivente. Se il
messaggio Le è giunto per errore, è tenuta/o a cancellarlo, ogni altra
operazione è illecita. Le sarei comunque grato se potesse darmene notizia.

This email is intended only for the person or entity to which it is
addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or
otherwise protected from disclosure. We remind that - as provided by
European Regulation 2016/679 “GDPR” - copying, dissemination or use of this
e-mail or the information herein by anyone other than the intended
recipient is prohibited. If you have received this email by mistake, please
notify us immediately by telephone or e-mail
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-users mailing list

Please make sure you read the following two resources before posting to this 
list:
- Earning your support instead of buying it, but Ian Turton: 
http://www.ianturton.com/talks/foss4g.html#/
- The GeoServer user list posting guidelines: 
http://geoserver.org/comm/userlist-guidelines.html

If you want to request a feature or an improvement, also see this: 
https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/wiki/Successfully-requesting-and-integrating-new-features-and-improvements-in-GeoServer


Geoserver-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-users

Reply via email to