(Thomas - good to hear your talk was accepted.)

Now we have at least two talks for a spatial session.

Others who get your geo talk accepted - let us know on this list.

George



> On Sep 28, 2016, at 6:32 AM, Thomas Burgess | indoors <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Dear George,
> 
> FYI: my talk "Geospatial track: Crowd learning for indoor navigation” was 
> accepted to Apache: Big Data Europe.
> 
> g-mail actually marked the notification email as SPAM, so perhaps advise 
> other submitters that this might have happened to them too.
> 
> best,
> Thomas
> 
> On 27 September 2016 at 16:11:43, George Percivall 
> ([email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>) wrote:
> 
>> Rich, 
>> 
>> Its good news that there may be enough talks to make a geospatial session. 
>> 
>> I was unable to determine the total number of geospatial related proposals 
>> using the review interface. 
>> Interesting approach for reviews where the UI shows two abstracts 
>> side-by-side and the reviewer is to favor one more than the other. 
>> I am interested in the results of that review process, but it did not allow 
>> any synoptic view of the submissions. 
>> 
>> George 
>> 
>> 
>> > On Sep 27, 2016, at 9:03 AM, Rich Bowen <[email protected]> wrote: 
>> >  
>> >  
>> >  
>> > On 2016-09-27 04:58 (-0400), Martin Desruisseaux 
>> > <[email protected]> wrote:  
>> >> Hello all 
>> >>  
>> >> The "Geospatial track: Apache SIS for Earth observation and beyond" talk 
>> >> proposal has been accepted for the Apache Big Data Europe, November 
>> >> 14-16 in Seville (Spain). Do we have any new about other geospatial 
>> >> talks for that conference? 
>> >  
>> >  
>> > It looks like there are other Geospatial sessions tentatively accepted. 
>> > However, until we get confirmation from speakers, we're not ready to 
>> > publish the schedule. 
>> >  
>> 
> <logo_small.png> <http://indoo.rs/>Dr Thomas Burgess
> Chief Research Officer
> +43 660 5981845
> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> www.indoo.rs <http://www.indoo.rs/>
> 
> This email and its attachments are confidential.
> 

Reply via email to