Lewis - thanks!

FYI - OGC is preparing a press release announcing the session.



> On Feb 27, 2018, at 12:54 PM, Lewis John McGibbney <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Yes thanks Daniel,
> George,
> Sounds good. I've advertised internally at JPL, across ESIP and will also 
> include it as an 'other business' announcement on all of the telecon's I'm on 
> moving forward.
> I'm going to reach out to fundraising@ with the aim of obtaining some 
> sponsors involved in spatial data.
> Lewis
> 
> On 2018/02/21 14:55:25, George Percivall <[email protected]> 
> wrote: 
>> (Daniel - thanks for pointing to the archive.)
>> 
>> Lewis,
>> 
>> Yesterday I exchanged a series of messages with Rich Bowen who is organizing 
>> ApacheCon 2018.
>> Rich confirmed that if we have sufficient response there will be a 
>> geospatial track.
>> Based on Rich’s confirmation I sent a message to [email protected].
>> 
>> This years’ conference is smaller than the multiple events held joint 2 
>> years ago in Vancouver
>> For 2018, we can have a full day geospatial session of presentations and 
>> perhaps a BoF discussion in casual setting.
>> Additional time is dependent upon additional hotel meeting room space - for 
>> which a sponsor is needed.
>> 
>> I will be sending announcements to OGC channels to promote the session.
>> Please consider promoting the session through your organizations outreach 
>> channels.
>> 
>> George
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On Feb 21, 2018, at 3:30 AM, Daniel Gruno <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> On 02/21/2018 01:24 AM, lewis john mcgibbney wrote:
>>>> Hi Folks,
>>>> Rich mentioned on his general ApacheCon NA18 announcement emails that there
>>>> would be 4 tracks this time around.
>>>> Can anyone confirm if Geospatial is definitely one of these?
>>>> In 2016 the GeoSpatial track ran for 2 days... is the intention this time
>>>> around to increase that?
>>>> Also, where is this ML archived? I cannot find it on mail-search.a.o or
>>>> lists.a.o
>>> 
>>> https://lists.apache.org/[email protected] ? :)
>>> 
>>>> Lewis
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 

Reply via email to