Previous geospatial tracks have been led by a group. Having several organizers 
increases the breadth, spreads the workload, and provides equitable review of 
proposals.  Having a group allows an organizers to submit a paper for 
consideration by the gorup.

I volunteer to be one of the organizers for the year’s geospatial track.  
Its good to see Marco and Jia volunteering to be organizers.
Martin - are you also volunteering to be an organizer of the track?

George



Previous Geospatial Tracks
- ApacheCon 2022 
<https://sites.google.com/view/georoundtable/apachecon-2022-geors-track>
- ApacheCon 2021 <https://www.apachecon.com/acah2021/tracks/geospatial.html>
- ApacheCon 2020 <https://www.apachecon.com/acah2020/tracks/geospatial.html>
- ApacheCon2019 
<https://www.apachecon.com/acna19/s/#/schedule:~:text=Geospatial-,software>  
- ApacheCon 2018 
<https://web.archive.org/web/20210419063909/https://www.ogc.org/node/2740?utm_campaign=OGC%20Update&utm_medium=email&utm_source=Revue%20newsletter>
- first geospatial track at Apache Big Data 2016 
<https://apachebigdata2016.sched.com/list/descriptions/type/Geospatial>





> On Feb 27, 2023, at 1:36 PM, Marco Neumann <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> so I think a geospatial track should always be present at apache.
> 
> so I would volunteer in assisting to organize a geospatial track.
> 
> Marco
> 
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 5:56 PM Martin Desruisseaux <
> [email protected]> wrote:



> On Feb 27, 2023, at 12:54 PM, Martin Desruisseaux 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Hello Jia
> 
> Le 27/02/2023 à 18:39, Jia Yu a écrit :
> 
>> This is Jia Yu from Apache Sedona. I will be happy to organize the ApacheCon 
>> geospatial track. I have lots of experience on organizing big conferences 
>> (mostly academic conferences).
>> 
> Thanks! I will wait 1~2 days to see if there is other volunteers (it is okay 
> to have more than one organizer), then I will put you in copy to my reply to 
> the ApacheCon Planners mailing list. Hopefully we will get instructions about 
> how to add you on the mailing list.
> 
>     Martin
> 
> 

Reply via email to