Chris Holmes wrote:
Quoting Jody Garnett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Sad but true, Jesse since you are the defacto modulemaintainer can I
have permission to go in and hack the TypeEntry information out of
there? As I recall this made use of blahblah.shp.xml to try and get
bounds information - since no shp.xml files were ever seen in the
wild I
don't think anyone will know/care.
Speaking of Shapefile, I have a small improvement I'd like to do, but it
looks like we're maintaining two versions of shapefile? indexed on
non-indexed? So since I have to do this on 2.1.x as well, does that
mean I need to commit it four times?
Thanks Chris I had not thought of that ... the situtation is not that
bad, one implementation is a subclass of the other or something.
Can we merge the two? I think they were always meant to be, when
indexed reached maturity. It's just an option in the datastore
factory, you can click if you want it indexed or not.
Also, can we nominate Jesse to upgrade from defacto to official module
maintainer? I'm +1
I would second that - Jesse may protest :-)
+1
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download
it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own
Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
_______________________________________________
Geotools-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
