aside to whom?

from a GeoAPI stand point, i would like to continue to support the 
org.opengis.sld.*Symbol objects more than the
*.go.display.primitive.*Symbolizer thingys.  i most definitely intend to
keep using Symbols, but i may be able to let Symbolizers fall by the
wayside.

from a geotools stand point, well, i'm not fit to answer that one.
i would think you guys would want to sort of gloss over the whole
Graphic side of things and stick to Features (and the coming Coverages).


> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:geoapi-devel-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jody Garnett
> Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2005 2:14 PM
> To: Reynolds, Greg
> Cc: Martin Desruisseaux; Geotools-devel; geoapi
> Subject: Re: [Geoapi-devel] Style dis-harmonization
> 
> Reynolds, Greg wrote:
> > I am sensing a push to move to JDK 1.5...
> >
> No real push, we are stuck at Java 1.4 until J2EE types have a
migration
> path ... however this does leave
> us with the *cutover* technique, which was not much fun for CRS last
year.
> 
> Aside: Any idea if Symbol or Symbolizer will be used in the future?
> 
> For now just going to update the geotools interfaces, and include
GeoAPI
> method names (where
> they don't already match).
> 
> Jody
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> >> Of Jody Garnett
> >> Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2005 1:09 PM
> >> To: Martin Desruisseaux
> >> Cc: Geotools-devel; geoapi
> >> Subject: Re: [Geoapi-devel] Style dis-harmonization
> >>
> >> Jody Garnett wrote:
> >>
> >>> Corey and I will be updating these interfaces to refer to
> >>>
> >> the latest
> >>
> >>> publish specification (SLD 1.0), we will also allow for
> >>>
> >> LabelShields,
> >>
> >>> to ensure that the result is flexable enough to allow for
> >>> experimentation.
> >>>
> >> Well the first idea failed - we need Java 5 type narrowing to
> >> pull it off.
> >>
> >> The idea was:
> >> - GeoAPI PolygonSymbol - unchanged
> >> - GeoTools PolygonSymbolizer - extend PolygonSymbol
> >> - GeoTools PolygonSymbolizerImpl - implement duplicated method
> >>
> >> The obviously has conflicts as the two interfaces report back
> >> different classes for Fill, and Stroke.
> >> Performing the same change on Fill and Stroke is *still*
> >> circular, without Java 5 there is no way for a GeoTools
> >> PolygonSymbolizer to "narrow" the scope and indicate that
> >> just a GeoTools Fill is returned.
> >>
> >> So this technique could work, but would break all geoTools
> >> renderers and client code.
> >> Jesse points out that this could be handled with a
> >> refactoring tool, but this is more work then our short term
> >> goal justifies.
> >>
> >> This experience will repeat itself Martin, every transition
> >> to GeoAPI interfaces will be disruptive in nature until we
> >> can assume Java 5 as a target.
> >>
> >> Jody
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> -------------------------------------------------------
> >> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the JBoss Inc.  Get
> >> Certified Today Register for a JBoss Training Course.  Free
> >> Certification Exam for All Training Attendees Through End of
> >> 2005. For more info visit:
> >> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7628&alloc_id=16845&op=click
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Geoapi-devel mailing list
> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoapi-devel
> >>
> >>
> >>
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the JBoss Inc.  Get Certified Today
> Register for a JBoss Training Course.  Free Certification Exam
> for All Training Attendees Through End of 2005. For more info visit:
> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7628&alloc_id=16845&op=click
> _______________________________________________
> Geoapi-devel mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoapi-devel




-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the JBoss Inc.  Get Certified Today
Register for a JBoss Training Course.  Free Certification Exam
for All Training Attendees Through End of 2005. For more info visit:
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idv28&alloc_id845&op=click
_______________________________________________
Geotools-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel

Reply via email to