Jody Garnett a écrit :
Would people like to be able to :
1. Allow abstract classes as part of api, or
2. Force api to be only interfaces, and make people double up with
interface/ abstract class pairs.
Personally I like 2, having api be all interfaces. Anyone else have
any thoughts.
I don't much mind - I think someone (Martin Perhaps, needs to kick out
custom implementations of everything and may prefer interfaces).
I don't mind neither as long as the interfaces or abstract classes live
in Geotools. If they were going in GeoAPI, I would prefer interfaces
since some developpers outside Geotools have asked very strongly for
implementation freedom. But in the Geotools's API module, abstract
classes are just as fine for me.
Martin.
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idv37&alloc_id865&op=click
_______________________________________________
Geotools-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
