I agree here. The only reason to make it an interface would be for
someone to create different implementations of style objects, but if
that work is already done by the factories then I dont see a need.
-Justin
Jody Garnett wrote:
Given the nature of StyleBuilder (border line creational object already
parametrized by factories, I would like to leave it as is (and not split
it out into interface and implementation.
This would put it in the same category as the FactoryFinders, helper stuff.
Note I am expecting all Parsers, user interfaces and so on to make use
of a StyleBuilder - consider it a set of utility
functions that have already been paramertized by the application.
Documentation is much improved to styling package.html
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log
files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click
_______________________________________________
Geotools-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
--
Justin Deoliveira
The Open Planning Project
http://topp.openplans.org
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click
_______________________________________________
Geotools-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
