On Tue, 2005-11-01 at 21:39 +1100, Martin Desruisseaux wrote: > Should we sign Geotools JAR as part of the build process (I mean, can it > be a cause of trouble for some applications?). I can add this step to > the Maven 2 build if desired (but not in Maven 1 build). However, it may > take a few weeks before the Maven 2 build is fully functional. > I vote no. Those who need signed jars will be able to do so, those who don't need signed jars won't care. And having all jars (application as well as third party library) signed by the same entity is preferable to a patchwork.
-- Trevor Stone ~ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Software Developer ~ Tyler Technologies, Eagle Division Denver Office ~ 1-866-554-4434 / 303-271-9100 ext 208 Curse of the moment: Thou haughty crook-pated wagtail! Why bother getting dressed? You'll just take it all off when you go to bed again. -- me ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
