Bryce L Nordgren wrote:
I have watched your email on a couple of lists, now and would like to
voice a word of encouragement. Often the lists seem to wait to see how
you make out :-) We are quiet because we are cautious, not because we
don't care/notice...
:) Thanks.
No bites on the JTS list I take it? An alternative approach to to bother
Paul Ramsey (apparently the
PostGIS types have been looking into the problem from the prespective of
a SQL multi-media ISO flavour
as a follow up to SFSQL). Paul Ramsey would know more details...
I would really like a review of the Feature Model work with respect to
your noted OGC/ISO differences. Can you think of a good way to go about
that?
I think it's premature to do a code review. What you call a Feature is
really a specialized type of feature which Topic 5 calls a Feature With
Geometry.
My understanding was that the Geometry is not required, I would love to
drag things back as close to Entity / EntityType
as I can get. Indeed the construct called Complex and ComplexType that
gabriel put together is basically "Feature without a Geometry"...
I did find a link for you:
http://www.fgdc.gov/standards/meetings/minutes/2002/2002-02/ISO_19109.ppt
Woot! Thanks you are a pal, some late night reading for me.
Jody
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click
_______________________________________________
Geotools-devel mailing list
Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
