simone giannecchini wrote:
aehm, the attachement was not... attched!
Simone.
On 1/23/06, simone giannecchini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi guys, i would like to know what do you think about the attached
drawing. I have been asked to write something about geotools and
geoserver and this will part of the complete stack.
Hi Simone ;-) Your diagram is interesting - but not the way I think
about geotools.
You do have layers close to what you describe:
1. Filter should be Filter/Expression (because Styling acutallly uses
Expression)
2. Coverages are built ontop of Features (or at least at the same level)
3. Geometry & JTS are kind of at the same level/or the same thing,
unless you are talking about the lite Java
Shape classes Martin uses in J2D Renderer (in which case they are
part of rendering)
4. GML is built ontop of Features and XML
5. Metadata is at the same level as CRS and Units
But the only one that is really interesting is this - the Plugins happen
at each and everyone of those layers.
You can also name some of the services built ontop of the core: Graph,
Validation
You can find my take on the situtation, in the developers guide: I am
sorry but confluence is down and I cannot send you the link.
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Geotools-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
