Hi guys,
a quick qestions, which specifications, if any, we implement on the
feature side of main module?
Thanks,
Simone.
On 1/24/06, simone giannecchini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: simone giannecchini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Jan 24, 2006 4:35 PM
> Subject: Re: [Geotools-devel] Re: Geotools layers diagram
> To: Jody Garnett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
> Ok, I made some changes based on your suggestions.
>
> Simone.
>
> On 1/24/06, Jody Garnett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > simone giannecchini wrote:
> >
> > >Guys, I am here again, I changed it again in order to incorporate all
> > >your advice.
> > >Here I am not trying to depict in details all the modules that are in
> > >geotools but I am trying to stack up the various standards we employ
> > >in order to go from the data sources to the services. Moreover a bit
> > >of future work (metadata) must be included (I am trying to get
> > >fundings for a catalog).
> > >
> > >Again, I would like to hear from you what you think about this.
> > >
> > >
> > Thanks for the clarification of intent, looks pretty good. Your "L"
> > shapes make sense in this regard.
> > - Depending on your thinking you may wish to reverse the order of
> > Feature and Coverage (if you cannot place them at the same level by
> > forming a two "L" shapes into a "U" ).
> > - if you extend GML up a notch (as Filter makes use of GML for its literals)
> > Jody
> >
>
>
>
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid3432&bid#0486&dat1642
_______________________________________________
Geotools-devel mailing list
Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
