Adrian Custer wrote on 03/03/2006 08:16:29 AM:
> Hey, > > Congratulations on all the work. > > (I'm working to get to the point where I can intelligently comment on > the > coverage work but I'm not yet ready.) > > Any chance you could add to the description/introduction a blurb about > how this fits into all the coverage working going on with Geotools (for > version x in early 2006)? I assume this is the proposal to transition > from 'coverages for simple features' to something more complex. Also I'm > not at all clear about the 2.2 versioning. This will be(/is it) part of > Geotools 2.2? Worthy questions. You prompted me to construct this page a little earlier than planned, so it's a little "premature". Let me know if more information needs to be added. This page attempts to consolidate the pre-implementation work into one spot, provide an "implementation effort primer", and also provide a summary and status board for all coverage implementation related Jira issues in both GeoAPI and GeoTools space. Because it tries to do so much, it will probably fail at everything. :) http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/Coverage+Implementation+Central Bryce ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
