Looks like fun, any chance you guys can post the latest javadocs on the
web (downloading the zip to review if good, but discussion goes better
when we can pass links back and forth).
I like the direct implementation, however it does not give me any wiggle
room to slot different implementations behind. Did you guys review the
graph package in JCS? There is a port of this in geotools as well. So
far it looks like integration is possible with the addition of a new
GraphBuilder that would use jts.planargraph as its internal format.
I understand that constructing everything as classes is great from a
code maintenance viewpoint (as you never have to worry about people
sticking half baked implementations into your system), but it does
impact on our ability to reuse your work.
One of the advantages to JUMP (that I have yet to see matched in any
system) is the ability to quickly implement Feature on any domain object
and get a visualization. It would be nice to do the same thing for Edge
and Node, although I admit that aggregation can do the trick as well.
Looking forward to seeing where this goes,
Jody
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Geotools-devel mailing list
Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
