Bryce L Nordgren wrote:
For those interested, please review and comment. Silence means these
departures from 19123 will be implemented in GeoAPI and GeoTools.
Grin, on a related note we do need to do better at communicating. The
Geotools 2.2.x gestation was long that it is no
longer obvious what a significant step forward it is. The Coverage
branch is lasting longer then that, can you make one
of the meetings and keep giving status reports on it?
This will be even more important as you get closer to merging on trunk.
I will want to talk to you about operations at some point, but
the pressure for a geoapi release is off so you will need to ping me a
couple weeks before you need the work completed.
I am really looking forward to getting this RnD work back on trunk so we
can all work a bit more as a team of module maintainers again ;-)
PS: These are part of the Reference guide on
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/Coverage+Implementation+Central
They are incomplete: only sections 1.1 and 1.2 in each contain the fixes.
http://docs.codehaus.org/download/attachments/46835/Specialized+Domain+Objects.pdf?version=1
http://docs.codehaus.org/download/attachments/46835/Specialized+Value+Objects.pdf?version=1
Thanks for making pdfs Bryce, and taking this stuff so seriously. I will
put it on my evening reading list and get back to you tomorrow.
Jody
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Geotools-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
