Yeah i could try and give this a shot in my abundant spare time ;). The
fm branch has really only been out for a couple of weeks. And the plan
is to go like mad to get complex-features onto it and then a quick easy
merge onto main.
But if the test merge goes ok i would be willing to change my vote back
to +1.
-Justin
Jody Garnett wrote:
Justin Deoliveira wrote:
Changing vote to -1 until R&D branches come home.
Not sure I want wait, some of the RnD branches are out for a year
already. If you are still changing your vote you may wish to consider an
experiment to check what would happen.
Hmm, after thinking more about this I realize that I will probably get
screwed if we go forward with formatting now. I think the gain of
having 6 months of work come back home smoothly outweighs the need for
consitency at the moment.
I could live with that, but if we go there I need the Developers Guide
changed.
I know that theoretically running jalopy on both branches and then
merging should elliviate most of the issues but I am still hesitant.
So how can we answer this?
1. ensure the coding conventions agree w/ Sun + GeoTools header
2. make a "formatting" branch, and ask you to try out the process for
the fm branch?
Jody
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Geotools-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
