Jody Garnett wrote:
Andrea Aime wrote:
Hi,
we are working on an application where we need to edit
FeatureType/AttributeType
stuff in a rich client, and the send them back to the server for update.
The problem is, the communication protocol uses serialization, and these
classes are not serializable.
Can we mark them as Serializable or you do see a good reason not to?
Please vote :-)
+1 (although perhaps edit is too strong a word as they are immutable).
PS: btw, also DefaultFeature and the like are not serializable. Too
bad in my
opinion, they should be. What about changing these too?
That would be a nice experiment, but you would need to ensure that any
and all data stored in the
feature is serializable. As a compromise please talk to justing about
making SimpleFeature serialiable (as it is
already restricted to simple types).
+1
-------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Geotools-devel mailing list
Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
