Andrea Aime wrote: > Two interesting suggestion that came up during the gt2 meeting to reduce > visual clutter: > - reverse engineer dependencies only from public/protected methods, > avoid private ones > - don't depict dependencies among classes in the same package, they are > supposed to be related > anyway. > > If I implemented those, would you be happy of generating gt2 javadoc > this way, maybe just as > an option for automated builds? (I really believe the diagrams would > help newbies a lot, and also > developers too, raise your hand if you think you know well the whole > source code base :-) ) > +1
But you may also wish to ask on the users list :-) Or at least share your joy. Looking at the pictures for feature source, I really do not care to know about the implementations I am related to if they only depend on me by implementing an interface. Thinking of the implementation of repository shown there... does not show me anything that Repository did not show me. Jody _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
