Thanks for the summary - seems to have been cut off? Perhaps a send as 
html setting?
> Hi All
>
> I just read the IRC meeting on the 19 June 2006, and made a summary for all
> of those who missed it :-)
>
>  
>
> 1)       Jalopy (before merge)
>
>  
>
> *                      Merging branches is a mess because of different
> formattings.
> *                      Start using Jalopy as part of the build.
> *                      Need to update Jalopy settings to the correct header.
> *                      Possibly format all current branches with the main
> pom.xmls all having the same plug-in formatter and config.
> *                      At least run Jalopy on coverage and rendering to help
> the GC branch merge in.
> *                      Autoformat on commit is the ideal solution, but not
> right now.
>  
> 2)           Doc Ownership
>  
> *                      2 issues:
>                                                           i.
> Who has the copyright?
>                                                       ii.
> What is the license?
>  
> *                      Easy strategy for copyright would be to have the
> authors jointly hold the copyright, making the license impossible to change
> later on.
> *                      Consensus seems to be that OsGeo hold the copyright,
> thus authors need to explicitly assign copyright to OsGeo.
> *                      The PMC requires an official request from OsGeo for:
>                                                           i.
> their acceptance of the copyright, ideally with some commitment to keeping
> it 'free' and
>                                                       ii.
> some mechanism for us to assign our rights to them.
>  
> *                      Timeframe required so that no more time is spent
> thinking about it.
>  
> *                      Q: how can the PMC officially ask OSGeo to receive
> copyright for our docs?
>             A: write a letter indicating that the copyright is being
> assigned to OSGeo.
>  
> *                      Q: Who is Rich Steele?
>             A: Rich Steele is the OSGeo lawyer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]).
>  
> *                      Acuster will write a letter to the lawyer asking how
> to proceed and hopefully get a letter of assignment. Once this is done,
> formal voting from the PMC to accept the process can take place on the
> mailing list.
>  
> 3)           GC Rocks out!
>  
> *                      Q: what still needs to be done before starting the
> merge of gc onto trunk?
>             A: there are basically NO new things to do, just some more
> testing and bug fixing as we are doing
>  
> *                      Coverage branch includes grib support.
>   




_______________________________________________
Geotools-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel

Reply via email to