Martin Desruisseaux wrote: > This issue may become more accute if for some reason we wish to host > C/C++ code in the Geotools project for GDAL or Proj.4 bindings for example (I > realize that GDAL > bindings already exists, but if we use more C/C++ code in Geotools, there is > also some chances that > soon or later we meet the need for additional C/C++ code for particular > cases).
Folks, It doesn't alter Martin's main point, but I have very hopeful that we can put all C/C++ portions of GDAL bindings in the GDAL repository so that Geotools just needs to implement it's own adapter classes based on the GDAL SWIG generated Java api. Likewise for PROJ. Best regards, -- ---------------------------------------+-------------------------------------- I set the clouds in motion - turn up | Frank Warmerdam, [EMAIL PROTECTED] light and sound - activate the windows | http://pobox.com/~warmerdam and watch the world go round - Rush | President OSGF, http://osgeo.org ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
