Cory Horner wrote: >> But yeah, your new patch is _more_ likely to send unsupported filters >> to PostGIS, since it will do so when there's no GEOS present, in >> addition to adding unnecessary cruft to the already crowded >> PostGISDataStore when we've already decomposed it nicely to different >> classes, including ones in the parent class so others can use it. >> > > I wasn't aware that a functioning pre and post filter processing method > was in existence. In PostGIS and WFS such code was certainly broken or > incomplete. We will take a closer look, and rewrite as necessary. > It worked the last time I looked into it ... check with the module maintainer Justin for a sanity check. Jody
------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
