Answering a few questions:

Andrea Aime: I'm not sure I understood the last part about filters. You 
mean that you still have to port stuff from FM?
Jody Garnett: ah the changes went like this ...
Jody Garnett: we updated the GeoAPI Filter interfaces to Filter 1.1
Jody Garnett: and made geotools FM use them
Jody Garnett: and then merged that change to geotools trunk
Jody Garnett: Then we started in on the feature model
Jody Garnett: updating geoapi
Jody Garnett: and we have not completed that work nor merged to trunk
Jody Garnett: the the point in which justin updated trunk, is where we 
need to cut a geoapi jar...
Jody Garnett: the geoapi jar from trunk has 4 RnD efforts going on.
Jody Garnett: 1) filter - done
Jody Garnett: 2) FM - not done
Jody Garnett: 3) catalog - seems to be stuck not sure who is doing it ...
Jody Garnett: 4) coverage changes - not sure if it is done ...
Jody Garnett: There is a page where we planned to make branches for 
those 4 ideas, but nobody has done it yet.
Andrea Aime: Erk... too much going on... we can't make trunk depend on 
that 4 legged beast
Jody Garnett: that is why we need to shape up geoapi, I tried - I made 
the plan and just never got the time to break it up.
Jody Garnett: Um I better send this to geoapi list, chances are they do 
not remember.... it was Febuary.Jody Garnett wrote:

here is the page mentioned:
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEO/Repository+Organization

> Andrea has gradually noticed how messed up geotools trunk is right now
> ... and has been sobbing quietly in a little corner window of my desktop
> for minuets now (hi Andrea).
>
> Here is the situation:
> - GeoTools 2.2.x works against GeoAPI 2.0
> - GeoTools FM works against GeoAPI 2.1
> - GeoTools trunk is lost in the woods and the wolves are coming...
>
> I "think" the geoapi jar we are using for trunk is something Justin
> cooked up with Eclipse and put up on a wiki so others could compile FM,
> and then when the initial Filter changes were merged back onto trunk
> this franken jar entered our life.
>
> Since trunk is finally becoming important, and a target for GeoServer
> and uDig development we are going to have to fork a GeoAPI branch, get
> it to compile and give it a nice timestamp .... or we are going to have
> to catch up with the current GeoAPI snapshot.
>
> Andrea and Justin if you can please advise,
> Jody
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> _______________________________________________
> Geoapi-devel mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoapi-devel
>   



-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Geotools-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel

Reply via email to