Ian Turton ha scritto:
> On 7/31/06, Andrea Aime <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Ian Turton ha scritto:
>>
>> >>
>> > That would be fine. The filter stuff is still work in progress but I
>> > think the ability to do highlighting and selection is useful.
>>
>> Good. What surprises me a little is that apparently there's a full set of
>> gt2 filter clones in the geovista packages and I don't understand why.
>>
>> Second consideration: is it ok to have geovista packages in gt2?
>> Wouldn't it be better to rename them to org.geotools something?
>> I think keeping the headers should be enough (provided that there are 
>> headers
>> stating the code was created in the geovista project).
>>
> 
> those filters shouldn't be in the module, they aren't current;y used
> and are for use in geovista studio only feel free to delete them. With
> any luck I should have time and a good enough connection to do an
> update and look at the code.

I'm wondering. Is geovista studio still alive?
Is the license compatible with geotools?

I looked at its site a couple of times but could not figure it out
as a gis app, just saw lots of diagrams...

Cheers
Andrea

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Geotools-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel

Reply via email to