and the final part in which simboss suggests it would be better to port the in-house apps (geoserver/udig) to sort out the bugs and acuster suggests we release and fix bugs as we port apps.
<acuster> simboss, you ought to figure out what you are going to need for 2.3 <acuster> and see if we can't grab what you need <aaime> But I don't see this as something that will be happening soon <acuster> Jody wants to release an IP reviewed Geotools by September <simboss> I am fine wit <aaime> Anyway, let's post this part of the discussion on the mailing list and see what Jody and Justin have to say <simboss> NOT releasing 2.3.x soon <acuster> simboss, how much time would you like, ideally? <simboss> I would not be comfortable at all about it <simboss> it is not about time <simboss> I would like to see <simboss> first <simboss> udig trunk <simboss> and geoserver trunk <simboss> moving to 2.3.c <simboss> at that point <simboss> we will really start <simboss> removing bugs <acuster> fine but that's totally backwards <simboss> because some things changed <simboss> on 2.3.x <acuster> release often <simboss> like crs axies order <acuster> when they move, we'll fix bugs <acuster> Gt is a library <acuster> libraries release, users show up, use them, find (lots of) bugs, and libraries fix them <acuster> since 2.3 was a big change, it may have several .x releases ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
