Bryce L Nordgren ha scritto: > I missed the discussion, but I agree wholeheartedly with this email! > > 1] No one-size-fits-all hint. > 2] Internal data models adopt a single axis convention. (no hints at all; > just use CRS order)
Sorry, my understanding of Rob proposal was that everybody should use long/lat axis order internally. This would have scary performance consequences on both rendering and WFS serving because the data stores would have to provide data in that order, maybe just to re-swap them again if the required CRS for output is swapped again... (hint: on rendering we do reproject after decimation, so we do reproject just a minimal part of the original points). I know having to deal with axis swap is complicated on the source code level, but forcing an order on the data store has its problems too. Maybe I'm just misunderstanding? Cheers Andrea ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
