It is not uncommon to find servers either deployed using ESRI  
technology, or simply following the ESRI lead, that advertise their  
SRS as "EPSG:102190" or some other > 100000 "EPSG" code.  ESRI in  
Arc* has the concept for CRS "ids" and for "ids" in the EPSG range,  
they have used the EPSG numbers.  But, as Adrian has pointed out,  
there are lots of useful CRS definitions that are *not* in the EPSG  
database.

(Or, that are now in the EPSG database, but did not use to be (like  
102190, the ESRI code for "BC Albers" (Cubewerx invented their own  
code for it, 42102 (and then EPSG finally assigned a number, 3005 (so  
now we have 3 numbers!)))).

In order for uDig to interoperate with servers that advertise such  
numbers, we need to know what those numbers mean, so we need to be  
able to look them up.  I can just slam them into epsg-wkt, thereby  
continuing its legacy as the "pragmatic and non-standard standard  
plugin".

That will work for now.

But, in the long term, what is the correct design way to handle  
this?  we have the "real" EPSG database, which will presumably be  
updated over time, to include more and more projections as EPSG does  
their work.  And we have some projection numbers like the ESRI and  
Cubewerx ones, that were pretend standards, but exist in legacy  
software in lots of places.  And we have the global useful ones,  
which might also exist in legacy places (ESRI has a number for world  
mercator, for example) which would be hand to have around.

Any answers, projection gods?

Paul

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Geotools-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel

Reply via email to