Vitali Diatchkov wrote: > I have a question here. I don't follow the process of GT 2.3 development and > latest changes, but does it mean that specifying FeatureFactory for > particular DataStore, the last one starts to use factory to produce features > by its readers/writers ? > > That is what I thought earlier about how useful is this functionality. GT > was tightly coupled with default implementation of Feature API.. For > example I wanted that ShapefileDataStore produced objects of my own > implementation of Feature interface.. probably instances of classes being > inherited from default implementation classes and having my additional > methods that I could use by casting to my implementation class later on. > > Am I right that now we can inject FeatureFactory to DataStore? > That is the point :-) Our goal, our mission, .... as an example it would be nice to have GeoTools produce my own Pojos (that happen to implement the Feature interface).
Indeed the "code quality" issues around geotools letting you inject your own FeatureFactory (or FeatureTypeFactory) are most of what we spent our time doing on the FM branch. Cheers, Jody ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
