Jody Garnett wrote: > Yes that is good, > > Thanks for buckling down and thinking about what we need to deprecate > for the final 2.3.0 release. > > If I had my thinking cap on I would ask that we: > > Think about DataStore use of Filter .... > example: FeatureSource.getFeatures( Filter ) > Recommendation: set up new method getFilter( Filter ) > Result: I will try this tonight on the train > Not sure i understand getFilter( Filter ), do you mean getFeature( Filter )?
> Think about Style use of Expression .... > example: LineSymbolizer.setWidth( Expression width ); > Recommendation: Style really comes down to Corey and if we have > time/ability to clean things up w/ respect to the SLD 1.1 baseline > Result: wait for next release Yes, it does kind of suck to have our other api's depend on deprecated ones. It might be a lot of work to create non-deprecated methods in those api's though. > > Justin I would really like it if we ported FeatureTypeBuilder and > FeatureBuilder over, so that GeoTools 2.3 has a non deprecated way to > make the current feature model. > As would I, but I would like to avoid this feature creep for 2.3 ( pun on feature unintended :) ). We need to get the 2.3.x stable branch going so that udig and geoserver can start releasing gc support. I think the amount of interest in it makes it a priority target. -Justin > Cheers, > Jody > >> Also, for 2.3 we need to deprecate all the filter interfaces in api. >> Jody you are the module maintainer, is that cool? >> >> -Justin >> >> Justin Deoliveira wrote: >> >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> There was some expression classes that moved in the change over to >>> geoapi interfaces which of course is not backward compatable, so >>> geoserver and udig break when they switch over. >>> >>> We can move them back, but then geoserver wcs and 1.5.x branches break >>> as they already dealt with the breakage and used the moved classes. >>> >>> But I think for api consistency we should just move them back and have >>> those branches move back over as it is not a ton of work. I would like >>> to do this before 2.3.0-RC1 release. >>> >>> What do other people think? >>> >>> -Justin >>> >>> >> >> >> > > > !DSPAM:1004,450d4c9f123969771116852! > -- Justin Deoliveira [EMAIL PROTECTED] The Open Planning Project http://topp.openplans.org ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
