I would like to step back and handle literals correctly, and independently of a "defined" XXXAttributeType, Gabriel has made the suggestion several times now ....
I would like to ensure that we can work *just* from a AttributeType with .getType() == Boolean.class Jody > I would like to create an attribute type for booleans, similar to the > attribute types for the other primitives. textual, temporal, numeric, etc... > > Then add some logic in DefaultAttributeTypeFactory to create intsances > of these when a boolean value is encountered. > > Any objections? > > -Justin > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
