I will again be away of any internet connection for the next few hours.
Unfortunatly it overlaps with the IRC meeting, so I will again miss it...
I guess that IRC agenda is going to contains the following:
- "java logging" to "common/log4J logging" adapter: I can try to fix
issue if Log4J users can point me to them. Or maybe Andrea wish to
write a Log4JHandler / fix CommonHandler if he wish.
- Factories: it was my next task on my todo list after logging. Will
work on that this week. I realize that I'm going slowly again lately.
I have one minor issue. I noticed that tags are numbered as 2.3.0-M0, 2.3.0-M1
while I would have expected 2.3-M0 and 2.3-M1 if we were following the
numbering
scheme for 2.2. I guess that this change was made in prevision of 2.3.1-M0,
2.3.1-M1, etc. release? But do we plan to create such releases? I though that
after 2.3.0, we were going to create 2.3.1, 2.3.2, etc. directly? My only issue
with 2.3.0-M0 number schema (admitly minor) is that it break alphebatical
order.
When browsing for various Geotools JAR or Maven directories, 2.3.0-M0 will look
like a more recent version than 2.3.0 (I mean will appears before).
Martin
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Geotools-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
