Andrea Aime wrote: >>> stion, on the spec itself, can we specify the behavior per >>> featureType? Or do we only have the option to set globally? >> No - but if you could please put it down as a change request for >> OWS-4. Please ! > Agreed, that would be nice. Who can do that? TOPP, although I asked Chris because I was under the impression he is attending the conference calls. >> To do things the same way as last time we would need to "bring up" >> any datastore to the level needed to support a WFS implementation. >> Even if we cannot do this cleanly (say for shapefile) we can document >> a way to do it (make use of a shapefile "fid" attribute if available >> etc...). > That would mean adding support for FIDMappers on other datastores I > guess, and make them visibile > thru the API instead of keeping them as a internal tool to solve a > problem like in jdbc datastores. Indeed, I do feel we need to "upgrade" the DataStore API in order to respond the needs of WFS 1.1 (ie we need sorting as an easy example). I expect justin to be making suggestions as he goes here, but perhaps this has fallen to you Andrea?
Jody ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
