Adrian Custer a écrit :
> I'd like to think of referencing in two pieces, core and operation. I
> suspect only the second depends on geometry as presented in the diagram
> attached. Does this make sense?
Yes, I think that the diagram is quite accurate. I would suggest to ommit
"CRSUtilities". Generally speaking, everything in "org.geotools.resources" is
unsupported (used for internal purpose, but may change at any time. This
package
is ommited from javadoc). I will move selected methods from CRSUtilities to
CRS,
which is the supported class.
> Also would it make sense
> to have this set of geometry classes named and tagged separately from
> the more general geoAPI geoms (when those come along)?
I don't know yet. I need to see what the geometry implementation will look like.
Martin
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Geotools-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
