Hmm, I'm a bit lost as to why I would force '1' to be returned, and not just
default the value in the constructor. Probably just me getting sloppy at the
time.
For geotools' feature model (unless it changed), the value will ALWAYS be 0
or 1 (the maximum will always be 1).
On 11/23/06, Andrea Aime <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Justin Deoliveira ha scritto:
> Hi all,
>
> The method in question always returns 1 even though the field on the
> class is mutable. I would like to change the method to return the actual
> field, however I am weary of doing so.
>
> Given our feature model I understand the feature model. But I cant
> imagine any code actually depends on this behavior, as the model ignores
> it internally.
>
> My rationale for doing so is that I need the attribute type to carry
> enough information to be able to encode it in a gml schema.
I'm not sure I understand... getMinOccurs = 1 implies the attributes
will always have a single value (which means also it's required,
otherwise minOccurs would have to be 0, no, which is ok for primitives,
but not for objects?).
MinOccurs > 1 would imply the attribute is really a collection, but
I guess in this case we would declare the attribute type as String[]...
oh well, it could cover the case where we do return a collection, since
we cannot declare we return a List<String> (not even in java 5 I guess
due to generic erasure at run time?).
What was your question anyways? :-p
Cheers
Andrea
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Geotools-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
